1 min read
Artwork Operations: 7 Signs Your Process Grew by Accident
Most artwork operations do not become complicated overnight. They grow gradually as teams add new markets, stakeholders, systems and workarounds to...
5 min read
Tilda Eriksson
:
2026-10-08 10:30
Many brands buy artwork management software, hoping it will fix a slow packaging process. Often it doesn't, because the problem was never the tool. This article explains why automation projects stall and gives you a 20-question checklist to use before you invest.
Packaging automation readiness is how prepared your organisation is to automate packaging and artwork work. It covers four areas: the quality of your packaging data, how clearly your process is defined, whether roles and ownership are clear, and whether your current systems can support automation.
A company that is ready can automate tasks like routing, approvals and notifications and get real time savings. A company that is not ready often ends up with an expensive tool that people work around.
At Collabra, we have worked with packaging for more than 20 years and across 600+ artwork programs. We have seen automation projects succeed and stall. The difference is almost always in the preparation.
Packaging automation projects stall because the foundation under the technology is not ready. The software may work well, but it is built on top of unclear data, undefined steps and missing owners.
The four most common reasons are:
A common warning sign is a process problem that the team has promised to "fix later" for more than a year. If it wasn't fixed manually, automation will not fix it either.
Answer each question with yes or no. Every "no" shows an area to fix before, or alongside, an automation project.
How to read your score:
You should fix unclear ownership, undefined process steps and messy data before you automate. These three issues cause the most problems in automation projects, and no tool can solve them for you.
A practical order is:
This does not always need to be finished before you start looking at tools. But it should be planned as part of the project, not left for later.
If your process grew over time without a clear design, our article on artwork operations and the packaging operating model shows how to spot it and where to start.
You should automate first the steps that are already clear, repeated often and take a lot of manual time. These give the fastest and most visible results.
Good first candidates are usually:
Leave complex or unclear steps for later. Automate them only after they are stable and defined.
An artwork software rollout usually takes several months, depending on how ready your data, process and team are. The better prepared you are, the faster and smoother the rollout.
Typical phases include preparation, system setup, integration with existing systems, a pilot with one team or product range, training and full rollout. Delays often come from integrations and from users who were not involved early.
We describe the phases in more detail in our packaging artwork software implementation timeline. If you want to estimate the business value before you invest, see how to evaluate the ROI of your artwork management solution.
Collabra is a packaging agency based in Gothenburg, Sweden. We help brand owners with packaging strategy, design and production. We have worked inside FMCG packaging operations across many markets, suppliers and printers, which are exactly the places where automation projects tend to break first.
We do not start with software. We start by checking whether your organisation is ready. A packaging automation readiness assessment from Collabra looks at your data quality, process, organisation and technology fit. You get a readiness scorecard and a clear roadmap of what to fix first and what to automate first.
When the foundation is ready, the right technology can deliver real results, whether that is Cway, the platform developed by Collabra, or the artwork management system you already use.
Packaging automation readiness is how prepared an organisation is to automate packaging and artwork work. It depends on data quality, a clearly defined process, clear roles and ownership, and systems that can support automation.
Most packaging automation projects fail because of weak foundations: messy data, unclear ownership, undefined process steps and poor fit with existing systems. The technology itself is rarely the main problem.
Check four areas: data, process, organisation and technology fit. If data lives in spreadsheets, approvals have no clear owner or every job follows a different path, fix those issues first.
Start with clear, repeated tasks that take a lot of manual time, such as task routing, approval reminders, status updates and version control.
Yes. FMCG companies often manage many products, markets, suppliers and printers. This complexity makes clean data and clear ownership especially important before automation.
1 min read
Most artwork operations do not become complicated overnight. They grow gradually as teams add new markets, stakeholders, systems and workarounds to...
1 min read
Packaging approvals often involve many people, but that does not always mean ownership is clear. When brand, regulatory, QA and artwork teams are all...
1 min read
Every packaging portfolio starts with a manageable number of SKUs. Then someone requests a new size. A regional team needs a localized variant. A...